Another Einsteinian idiosyncrasy defeated

 Another Einsteinian idiosyncrasy defeated

The preamble of this post would be better with the table created by the famous businessman and international celebrity Ellon Musk, above the representative table demonstrating the owners of the largest media information agencies in the world, all of which are owned by Jews, which demonstrates the vision and reading or re-reading that what is done about things that appear monitored and published in the main information and news networks, including the Hollywood film industry of Seljnik, Mayer and Zanuck, all Jewish pioneers of American cinema, then created the Jewish myth of the God Einstein, who does not appear in the books of physics with the same prominence, he didn't even participate in the Manhattan project for the first atomic bomb and the first nuclear reactor with controlled nuclear reactions.

The theory of black holes authored by Einstein seems like one of those ideas, from Kubrick or the other fictional filmmaker Spielberg, very childish and contradictory, because according to the basic laws of classical physics such an object would only be classified as being seen and considered as a change in density of an archaeostar that imploded, but to justify the gravitational capacity, the characteristic of the density only serves as an explanation: it was the same stellar mass, in fact, diminished as the archaeostar that loses its primary fuel mass, generally exhausted hydrogen, consumed at the end of a life cycle of the star, and the helium remaining to be consumed in the adult life stage before transforming into a quasar or black hole, and the star remains exhausted with only its core, which is not enough to produce a space-sucking attractor capacity everything around because in the reality of Newton's theory of universal gravitational attraction the mass is the same as the failed star that gave rise to the black hole, by simple arithmetic the mass remained therefore the ability to attract does not depend on the density of the mass, but on the mass only, as with the planets Saturn and Jupiter; Saturn is as heavy as Jupiter and Saturn would float in the Earth's oceans due to its lower density, but a denser Jupiter would sink, both have enormous mass and attract asteroids in the same way, therefore, the origin of black holes needs a serious theory, and not this implosion cascade of ancient stars.

The idea of mini black holes follows the same fallacy that spatial density creates a destructive attractor, the law of gravitation does not speak of density only of mass attraction, except if they changed Isaac Newton's law of gravitational attraction and I didn't know You're welcome.