Scientific methodology in the paradigmatic crisis

 Scientific methodology in the paradigmatic crisis

Scientific methodology is mistaken, or in formal language, scientific methodology is an irrefutable model in the Poperian line, the moment of dialogue between the perspectives of Karl Popper and Thomas Kuhn.

Since the first escape from religious and mythological models and the transition to the world or system of metaphysics with the birth of the school of Greek philosophy 2500 years ago, even infiltrated by some mystical and traditional strands, then the Greek philosophical schools grouped between the two strands main ones: the ontological ones based on continuity, and the discontinuous ones from the thesis of the dialectical current that works on discontinuous opposites and discrepancies, ruptures and divergences that are not necessarily absolutely opposite.

We will make a brief review of the bibliography of methodology in general, making a forced reductionism, we can remember and relate the main currents of departure for theoretical and ontological and also epistemological support because all scientific and empiricist methods are based on a single principle, and this principle will be attacked in this monograph.

Starting with inductivism, a statistical aspect based on observations and preparation for the context of hypothesis, observation, experimentation, and conclusion, all based on the human expectation of continuity and monotonous repetition that induces in us the expectation of permanence and eternity that can be deceived by the senses, the five senses of our neurological system, therefore it can be deceived by them;

Deductivism is a reductionist form of inductivism, an anti-mathematical intuition that dispenses with any demonstration because it is self-evident, exempt from statistical formulation and innumerable, uncountable, immeasurable, unknowable, but apparently endorsed by the obviousness of common sense, it should be non-scientific, but they are considered evident, undemonstrable and eternal truths.

Detutivism can be reduced to inductivist form because the abundance of evidence makes it infinite or a regression to infinity, it cannot be questioned by any mathematics without being able to resort to mathematics or statistics.

The penultimate of the best-known scientific methods, the dialectic, is highly respected because it acts where numbers cannot reach and fills an empty space that represents the dialectical method. This method relies on the ability to debate between opposing ideas, and from opposites comes the conclusion and synthesis of extremes.

The most modern method, the Poperian, is a modernized extension of the dialectical method, which consists of the impermanence of provisional scientific truths which, seen in the past, scientific truths have become today fallacies, and false science known today as chimeras of the myth of the philosopher's stone of alchemy, astrology and superstitions; so this would be the future of all modern knowledge in the distant future turned into superstition by future scientists.

The Poperian method called hypothetical-deductive refutational suspends the reason of the time in advance, apologizing in advance for the conditional and contingent inconsistencies of our current state-of-the-art level, incapable of anticipating future scientific knowledge.

So we can conclude without fear of making mistakes that all scientific methods and techniques seek regularity in nature, which is sought through modeling with formulas and mathematical equations so that we can anticipate facts based on predictive formulas for nature's behavior.

  The five laws of dialectics:

1) EVERYTHING IS CONNECTED TO EVERYTHING;

2) NOTHING IS REPEATED IN NATURE;

3) THESIS AND ANTITHESIS GENERATE THE SYNTHESIS;

4) QUANTITATIVE CHANGES LEAD TO QUALITATIVE CHANGES;

5) THE SUM OF THE PARTS IS GREATER THAN THE WHOLE;

6) THE WHOLE CANNOT BE EXPLAINED BY THE ISOLATED PARTS;

7) THE WHOLE DETERMINES AND CONDITIONS THE BEHAVIOR OF EACH PART.

8) THERE IS NO SINGLE CAUSE FOR THINGS;

  So, there is a natural and intuitive tendency to see regularity in nature, but dialectics remind us that no two tree leaves are the same in nature, in shape, color tone, size, weight, nothing is repeated in nature. , there are not even two days with the same length of time on earth, at each moment different forces act on the earth so that the conditions never repeat themselves, we are rotating from zero to 1600 kilometers per hour depending on the position in north south latitude on earth, and in longitude, too, while the earth revolves around the sun as a primary reference at 107 thousand kilometers per hour, but the sun moves at almost 900 thousand kilometers per hour so the earth does not rotate but takes a spiral trajectory at 175 thousand kilometers per hour behind and around the sun, moving away and approaching about eight million kilometers at apogee and perigee, with an inclination of the axis of rotation that undergoes a precession, there are dozens of combined movements of the earth in space whose coordinate nothing ever repeats itself, but using the deductive method we have one day that is the same as another and it seems that intuitively nothing changes.

When a car leaves the assembly line, many of the parameters are estimated by the manufacturers and recorded in the vehicle's technical data sheet to be recorded after the parameters and their measurements have been duly checked during inspection, the only certainty we have is that each model produced would never be the same. to the other or at least equal to the technical specifications determined by the project and the rigorously expected production standardization.

The same models have all the data completely and randomly slightly different from each other, no car comes out exactly the same as the other, even the engine in perfectly normal operation is put to work at 3555 revolutions per minute although the dial indicates this regularity with each turn of the axle of the engine, it could be accurately measured that each revolution of the 3555 revolutions per minute each revolution has a slightly different speed, so at each revolution of the engine the parameters are slightly different, the explosion pressure is not repeated, the combustion temperature is different at each explosion because the amount of air and fuel varies slightly with each explosion, the moment of the explosion varies slightly from each other, the intensity of the electric spark from the spark plug varies in voltage and electric current with each ignition at moments out of phase in false synchrony with each other. of others and the density of the air changes every second, the humidity of the combustion air varies millimetrically every moment, so the engine variables vary every millisecond, the power varies every moment, while it seems that everything is repeated regularly.

The brain of the entire universe is called information feedback, or feedback, which in short is the process of reprocessing each piece of information by fixing or modifying the initial conditions or causes according to the effect of the output or the current moment, thus constantly correcting itself and continuously in the next moment the detected discrepancies that deviate from the standard, such as: our immune system that adjusts the organism's behavior patterns, or other subsystems such as phagocytosis; as the cytoplasmic membrane, in osmosis; sweat; salivation; tears are forms of adjustment to the internal and external environment to seek a new balance point of balance of resultant forces and entropic energy.

Thus the skin, hair and eyes of the Nordics are extremely bright to capture and let through every scarce ray of light during the nine months of twilight without sunlight, transforming the skin into a gigantic solar panel, while the skin, hair and eyes of the Black Africans transformed into gigantic sunshades protect their bodies from excess rays of sunlight, allowing a reduction in solar radiation.

Conclusions:

The method of doing science that seeks regularity is a human way of wanting to attribute to nature a human perspective that does not exist, there are no regularities in nature, nothing is the same, nothing is repeated, therefore the equations and formulas are nothing that can model and understand physical, chemical, biological and combined phenomena, because we cannot place nature in a standardized model of behavior, precisely the opposite of what we are doing, helped by mathematics and statistics.

Statistics is a rubbish proxy, as the rules of probability say that in a system of unbiased samples all possibilities have equal probability, which nature has never confirmed, as in drawing numbers the probability of a combination coming up in any sequence is equal to a probable random sequence because chance has no preference, but in reality we never see a draw for a sequence 01 02 03 04 05 06 that technically has the same probability as the sequence 60 12 13 17 24 36 no one would bet on the first sequence if You want to get the numbers right, or even create a random sequence by taking the last one or any result already drawn and adding one unit to each digit drawn.

What is this law of chance called? Can't it be represented by a statistical equation?

The universe is mocking our laws, our mathematics not just in the number pi or the square root of two, but we simply cannot with the reality of the chaos of randomness.